Re: RFS: python-snappy
2011/11/1 Jakub Wilk
<jwilk@debian.org>
* Shell Xu <shell909090@gmail.com>, 2011-10-31, 23:55:
The sentence lintian is complaining about (using-first-person-in-description) is: "Snappy is widely used inside Google, in everything from BigTable and MapReduce to our internal RPC systems." This certainly doesn't make sense in a description of a _Debian_ package.
I'm not interested in sponsoring this package, but here's my very quick review:
You probably want to build-depend on "python-all-dev", not "python-dev, python2.6-dev, python2.7-dev".
Please consider building also a package for Python 3.X, as upstream seems to support it, too.
I think the long description is a bit too verbose. The part that refers to the underlying library is even longer that description of libsnappy1 itself.
In debian/copyright, you don't need to repeat copyright information in the License field.
debian/docs is empty, so... just delete it.
Remove libsnappy1 from Depends. This dependency will be automatically generated by dpkg-shlibdeps.
The binary package doesn't depend on python. It's because you forgot to add ${python:Depends} to Depends.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20111031163324.GA1822@jwilk.net" target="_blank">http://lists.debian.org/20111031163324.GA1822@jwilk.net
Thanks for help, I will fix that all as soon as possible.
Reply to: