dear George, On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, George Danchev wrote: > priorities and procedures established by a broad agreement among the > project, and if you want something to improve, try doing it yourself > first as in do-ocracy, see links below of how to help. i don't exactly consider the links below an encouragement to do, rather than the contrary. that's what i call beaurocracy in Debian, right in an age in which even state apparata are moving towards fluidity for their own survival. > Of course, amusements and mere pestering doesn't help much > communicating your point. Of course, lack of criticism doesn't help much to realize what needs to be made better :) > Why it is so hard to just follow: > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper > and apply accordingly, help yourself and Debian. compare that with the process of "becoming an Ubuntero" in launchpad, which is free software BTW, and the answers will come to surface. > >Debian is "not very popular" among software developers.. > >acknowledging such situations is the first step to make things > >better, no? > > Sure, it is a well known fact that the Sun never shines... > (don't look out of the window) what do you mean?! sun?! shines? we're ninja turtles here! now close that window and gimme my pizza! :) ciao -- jaromil, dyne.org developer, http://jaromil.dyne.org GPG: B2D9 9376 BFB2 60B7 601F 5B62 F6D3 FBD9 C2B6 8E39 Send bitcoins to: 1EJYtvuq39hoWcventcnnvhPXh6i5QDReM
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature