On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:57:26 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > What do you think about the attached simple patches that try to address > various nits, some in the packaging, some in the upstream program? > Except for the Standards-Version bump, the watch file and the > description fixes, all the rest are suggestions rather than mandatory > fixes - they are all things that I'd do for my own Debian packages, but > of course it's up to you whether you want to do things that way or not > :) Another nitpick: "esadecimal" seems to be Italian (or an Italianism) for hex(adecimal); used in the description and the manpage. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Rolling Stones: Stick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature