Re: RFS: alure (updated package)
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tobias Hansen
<Tobias.Hansen@physik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> Here's what you said:
>
> (08:04:51) pabs: BigMc: since alure is a library, I suggest that you read
> libpkg-guide to get familiar with packaging libraries
> (08:05:23) pabs: libpkg-guide does recommend libfoo1-dev instead of
> libfoo-dev, which is against best practices
> (08:07:36) pabs: BigMc: nothing in Debian depends on alure yet, so you won't
> need to worry about any transition issues
>
> libpkg-guide says both names are ok for Alure, but of course I believe you
> when you say it's against best practices.
I guess I could have been more clear :)
To be clear, libalure-dev is the right name for most cases, you almost
never need a name like libalure1-dev.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: