[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: python-crypto (adopting package, fixes FTBFS)



On 04/09/2011 12:06 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Sebastian (2011.04.09_10:44:03_+0200)
>> Out of curiosity: what are the pros and cons of dh_python2 and where do
>> dh_pysupport and dh_python2 differ? In view of #617001 I thought I'd stick with
>> the successor of dh_pycentral.
> 
> dh_python2 is aiming to be the replacement to dh_pysupport and
> dh_pycentral. But not everyone is in agreement about that, yet.
> dh_python3 is the only helper for Python 3.
> 
> dh_python2 is simpler, in that it ships a static symlink farm for every
> supported Python version at build time. This means the package needs to
> be rebuild every time we change the supported Python versions in Debian.
> Seeing as Python 2.7 is the last version of Python (python3 is a
> separate stack in Debian), this shouldn't be an issue.
> 
> Having the package only be useful for versions of Python it's been
> tested with (assuming it has a test-suite) isn't a bad thing.

Thank you for the explanation.

Kind regards,
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: