Re: RFS: weboob

[Arno Töll <debian@toell.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05.04.2011 21:24, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I can't help but think that these package names and descriptions might be 
> offensive to parts of the Debian community.  Would Debian really be serving 
> it's users by including these packages as is?

I tend to agree, or at least I thought the same as I read the proposed
package names. On the other hand pornview lives happily since a decade
in Debian (ITP [2]).

On the other hand please see discussion for "hot-babe" [3] as well.


[1] http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=sourcenames&keywords=pornview
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=167488
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=283578
- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x8408D4C4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=2p+y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----