On 04/02/2011 04:12 PM, The Fungi wrote: > On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:02:19AM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: >> I think his package is already Arch:all. > [...] > > Ahh, yes, I had missed the package name/source. I agree your > analysis sounds a far more likely scenario given the problem > description. Perfect, thanks for the pointers. I think I see the picture now. Michael