Re: RFS: gnustep-base (updated package)
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: RFS: gnustep-base (updated package)
- From: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 07:27:08 +0300
- Message-id: <8739xwctpf.GNU's_Not_Unix!%yavor@gnu.org>
- In-reply-to: <20100512230201.79d6589e@utumno>
- References: <87vdavdhlb.GNU's_Not_Unix!%yavor@gnu.org> <20100512230201.79d6589e@utumno>
Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Uploaded.
Thanks! Unfortunately it failed to build almost everywhere, because
gnustep-make's dependency on gnustep-common is too loose. I'll
request give-backs once -make is installed on all archs, and will fix
this with the next upload.
> Also, could you please consider including patch I prepared for Ubuntu?
> http://patches.ubuntu.com/g/gnustep-base/gnustep-base_1.19.3-1ubuntu1.patch
Hmm, how come that gnustep-base-common is in Build-Depends-Indep? Are
such things allowed in theory and practice? It seems to me that there
will be a bootstrap issue, e.g. for new ports. Or maybe not, since
-common is arch:all and buildds use -B. I'm not sure, but it doesn't
look very elegant to me.
Anyway, some time ago a different solution was proposed:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnustep-dev/2010-02/msg00035.html
I'll test it and if it works, will ask upstream to comment/consider
the patch for inclusion.
Reply to: