Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian
On 2010-10-26, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/26/2010 04:53 PM, Michael Shuler wrote:
>> An existing source name conflict example I found:
>>
>> libsage2 - Source: sage
>> xul-ext-sage - Source: sage-extension
>>
>> -extension sounds a little cleaner to me. ;)
>
> I'd like to keep ubiquity, name chosen by upstream.
> And it's good because there are no packages named ubiquity in Debian.
>
> Derivatives can choose their own package names.
I think it is generally considered good practice to have a source
packaeg just building one binary package to be named the same as the
binary package.
(Yes, I know I have violated that a couple of times with my own
packages)
/Sune
Reply to: