On 10/26/2010 09:22 AM, Michael Shuler wrote:
On 10/26/2010 08:48 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:On 10/26/2010 08:52 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:Just for the records, Ubuntu has a ubiquity source package already (it's the d-i frontend), so if you're interested in having such package in Ubuntu too, you should consider using a different source name.I'm not interested in ubuntu. Rename could be even done by ubuntu maintainers, couldn't it?Most mozilla extensions have moved to a package naming scheme detailed here: http://wiki.debian.org/Mozilla/ExtensionsPolicy This would prevent issues with the naming collision Luca indicated.
Sorry, I missed that this is how your binary package is named, and that the question is about the source package.. I suppose that the source could also be named xul-ext-ubiquity.
-- Michael