On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:20:15 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > David Paleino wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:53:28 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > >> Since we are now in a freeze period, splitting the package up is not > >> appropriate, nor is a new upstream version that is not-preapproved by > >> the release team. > > > > Why? > > Testing is the one frozen, not unstable. And testing-proposed-updates is > > there for a specific reason, if needed :) > > To not interfere with current transitions and freeze exceptions. The freeze > announcement also mentions it. This package has no rdepends, how could it affect current transitions and freeze exceptions? Also, in the announcement I see: /--- | We don't ask you not to make changes in unstable, but we do ask that you be | aware of the effects your changes can have -- especially if you maintain a | library. \--- Have a nice day, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature