Re: RFS: libsmf

[Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>]

A review:

The first 3 symbols in the symbols file look like they might be
internal symbols that should not be exported, is that the case?

http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility

The SONAME should not be added to the -dev or utils packages. I'd
recommend naming the utils package smf-utils

Why does the -dev package depend on libc-dev?

I find it interesting that upstream uses readline (GPL) rather than
editline (BSD).

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise