[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Re: Denemo]



Il giorno sab, 05/09/2009 alle 09.50 +0200, Pietro Battiston ha scritto:
> Il giorno mer, 19/08/2009 alle 19.19 +0200, Patrick Matthäi ha scritto: 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Pietro Battiston schrieb:
> > > Rogério's mail ([0]) gave me desire to insist.
> > > 
> > > Now I'm being much more clearer and short: a (not so unpopular) package
> > > (Denemo) is unmaintained. It has bugs and a very old version packaged,
> > > which upstream strongly suggests to avoid. I repackaged it from scratch:
> > > last upstream version (and changes aren't really minor, also w.r.t.
> > > packaging), and dropped CDBS.
> > > 
> > > To the first mail I send, the maintainer answers, after 15 days, "I have
> > > no time to comment".
> > > To the second mail, where I link the package I made, no answer after 18
> > > days.
> > > 
> > > What should I do?
> > > 
> > > "Just wait" would also be an admissible response... but _how much time_?
> > > And then?
> > 
> > Please bug this package with your patch attached (or .dsc).
> > If he does not act within 10 days on it you could create an NMU, I am
> > willed to sponsor it, if there are no bigger misstakes in your packaging.
> 
> Done: see [0], get the .dsc at [1].
> 
> About why 0.8.8 was more problematic than 0.8.6, details are in
> debian/patches/08_git_autogen_config.dpatch .
> 
> [0]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513285
> [1]:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/denemo/denemo_0.8.8-1.1.dsc
> 

Removed, there was a lintian warning introduced with the last
modification, please wait a little until I upload a fixed version.

Pietro

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Questa =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente


Reply to: