Re: RFS: gnome-specimen
On 7/24/07, Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:35:17PM +0530, Kartik Mistry <kartik.mistry@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-specimen".
Hi Mike,
First of all, thanks for looking at package!
Just a few notes:
- In the manpage, I would add an article ('a') between "gnome-specimen
is" and "simple tool".
Done.
- In the manpage, still, most of the options (especially bonobo activation
and gnome library options) are pretty useless.
Hmm. It is meant for advance user or developer. But, should I keep it
or remove it. I think there is no harm to keep it in manpage.
- I think you should build depend on python-dev instead of
python-all-dev.
python-all-dev will make sure that all supported python version are
installed. correct me if I am wrong. python-dev is also ok in our
case.
- I don't really know cdbs, but i guess you can either put all your
build dependencies in build-depends or build-depends-indep.
Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 5), python-central (>= 0.5)
Build-Depends-Indep: intltool, libgconf2-dev, python-dev (>= 2.4)
Right? cdbs, debhelper and python-central are require for clean target.
I'm not confortable with sponsoring a package using cdbs, but if nobody
steps in, I will, since I'm very interested in having this in the
archive.
If you wish, I can convert it to debhelper, no problem :) Let me know,
I will upload corrected package.
Package with changes 1 & 3 are at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-specimen/gnome-specimen_0.3-1.dsc
Thanks again.
Cheers,
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Kartik Mistry | Eng: kartikmistry.org/blog
0xD1028C8D | Guj: kartikm.wordpress.com
--------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: