So everything is ok :-) I change the subject to RFS... The package is available here : http://www.le-vert.net/divers/debian-package/spcaview/ Thanks ! Let me know if there is still something wrong. Le mercredi 26 avril 2006 à 15:43 -0230, Lawrence Williams a écrit : > As long as it includes a Depends: on libsdl1.2debian, it will be fine. > > Lawrence > > On Wednesday 26 April 2006 13:49, Le_Vert wrote: > > Hello :-) > > > > So I can just leave my package as it is, nothing more to do ? > > > > Lawrence Williams a écrit : > > >Hello, > > > > > >As one of the SDL maintainers, I can confirm for you that the package > > >depending on libsdl1.2debian is completely okay. It is indeed a > > > metapackage which pulls in libsdl1.2debian-alsa by default (now), but can > > > use others (libsdl1.2debian-oss for example), as well. > > > > > >You can simply override this I think :) > > > > > >Lawrence Williams > > > > > >On Wednesday 26 April 2006 13:35, Le_Vert wrote: > > >>Ok spcaview is linked with /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 which comes from > > >>"libsdl1.2debian-alsa" but the depency have been generated on > > >>"libsdl1.2debian" which is a dummy package... > > >> > > >>How am I supposed to fix this ? Thanks! > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=