[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Depending on an essential package

On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 02:01:54PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:59:05PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > Packages aren't moved out of essential.
> So you can guarantee that bash will always be essential?

Certainly not. :-)  I'm saying that we don't plan to ever make it
non-essential, but plans can change. ;-)  However, moving a package out of
essential is not done lightly, since as you mentioned, it likely results in
breaking lots of packages.


I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: