Re: RFS: libdiscid
On (01/10/06 18:56), Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> James Westby wrote:
> >
> > See
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383040
> >
> > for an example bug that is the fault of using this field.
>
> The bug is about using ${Source-Version} between "Architecture: all" and
> "Architecture: any" packages, which indeed can cause problems.
>
> But in my case both libdiscid0 and libdiscid0-dev are "Architecture: any" and so
> both will be rebuilt on a bin-NMU -- which means ${Source-Version} won't cause
> any problems.
>
Yes, sorry, I wasn't thinking. However I still believe you should use
the field.
> > The file i was talking about was the public domain one.
>
> "Public Domain" = no copyright, no license.
>
Which needs to be mentioned in debian/copyright.
James
--
James Westby -- GPG Key ID: B577FE13 -- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
Reply to: