[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: minimum package name length

Am 2004-12-22 00:25:59, schrieb Tilman Koschnick:
> Hi,
> I'm intending to package the Cluster Command & Control tool suite [0],
> commonly refered to as C3. My package name of choice would be c3, but I
> was wondering if such short names are acceptable. Is there any
> documentation or general consent?
> When looking at the existing names, I noticed that there are no package
> names with only two characters, and not that many with three.

af an at bb bc bl cu cw dc di dx e3 ed ee es fv gb gq gs gv
hf ht hx im kq le lv m4 mc mp nd ne nn pi pv qe qm rc re ri
sc sl sn sp tf ud vh vm wl wv xt yh 

Are 52 enough ?

> Cheers, Til


Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ 
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/88452356    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)

Attachment: signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: