Michael K. Edwards wrote: > Perhaps the tool that generates the list could be amended to list "someone > other than maintainer has responded, but maintainer has not" cases. Is > this likely to generate a lot of false positives? I'd think that it generates quite some false positives. It also leads to some inconsistency: If someone takes care of a bug on the list after reading it, the bug will still be considered neglected by the lists's own criteria. Regards T.
Attachment:
pgpwVlJU7nv7r.pgp
Description: PGP signature