[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Problem with dependency declaration



On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:55, Eike Sauer wrote:

> Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
> > You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
> > marked Essential: yes).
> 
> But "you ar not required" doesn't mean "you are not allowed".
> So what would be wrong with depending on "coreutils | stat"?
> 
Nothing, it's allowed; especially for when you need a specific version
or a variant like this.

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: