Re: "harry up for freeze" strangeness
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 12:03:33PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Most packages of mine are not listed in the update_excuses.html page so
> I guess that all packages not listed here are in testing with no problem
> at all, am I wrong? (Note that currently I have no open bug).
That's right.
> The only package that is listed as out of date is lablgtkmathview, it is
> out of date on arm and sparc architecture. On arm the last built was
> tried Wed 17 Oct and failed to unmet dependencies on lablgtk package.
> Currently the problem of lablgtk is solved but the built was not retried
> ...
> How can I manage to retry the built?
> Again: on sparc the built was not tried at all, but last upload was a
> lot of time ago, how can I manage to try the built?
You'll need to talk to the porters for those architectures
(debian-$arch@lists.debian.org).
> Last one, in the page unstable_probs.html are listed minidom and
> gtkmathview packages (both are mines):
>
> * Binaries from gtkmathview 0.2.7-1 cannot be installed:
> * libgtkmathview-bin(sh)
> * libgtkmathview-dev(sh)
> * libgtkmathview0(sh)
>
> * Binaries from minidom 0.1.2-2 cannot be installed:
> * libminidom-dev(sh)
> * libminidom0(sh)
>
> What does this means? What I have to do to solve the problems?
Don't worry about those. That just means that binaries for the 'sh'
architecture (Hitachi SuperH) aren't available and thus can't be
installed, but since sh isn't in testing that's not a concern. (As far
as I know sh doesn't have a working autobuilder, and it's certainly
falling behind.)
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: