[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DH_COMPAT 2 or 3 ?



On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 07:44:34AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Why exactly?  It's not a crime to create two separate packages; one
> > for stable and one for unstable.  You can change the build
> > dependencies to match the distribution.
> 
> Well, the idea is to have only one package for both, this make things simpler,
> create less work for me, and should be more error proof in general.
> 
> Anyway, forking a package for 2 lines difference in the debian/rules file, and
> different build-depends don't seem worth it for me.

So it'll potentially create different binaries with the same version
number on the different platforms.  Hmm.  Why not just go with the
potato version?  It should work fine on unstable.

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

         Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
       Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/



Reply to: