Re: Progress in merging neurodebian team?
Hi Yaroslav,
Am Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 05:21:52PM -0500 schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko:
> > There are packages I gave up. For instance I have some mental note on
> > fsl saying: non-free, outdated (upstream has version 6.0) and terribly
> > complex.
>
> yeah, don't bother with FSL! Even though still popular, non-free
> license, and no longer fully open source AFAIK.
So shouldn't we file an RFM bug against fsl?
> If any other alternative in purpose -- pick up AFNI please.
> Major (if not all) licensing issues were resolved, we never uploaded to
> debian proper though. Upstream is very receptive and friendly.
> Problems:
> - age (in how long it has been out there, but it is still active)
> - original build infrastructure was "suboptimal",Michael redid in cmake,
> upstream worked on establishing their own cmake build infra but they
> are not actively use it
>
> our aged, not updated in awhile packaging:
> https://github.com/neurodebian/afni/tree/debian
>
> upstream: https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/
> https://github.com/afni/afni
I transfered https://salsa.debian.org/neurodebian-team/afni (and
afni-data) to Debian Med team. Would you mind checking the status from
Github to ensure we have the latest packaging status if someone might
want to continue?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: