Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-11-28 23:14:16 +0100: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:43:59PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > Changes are available on Salsa for review: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/quorum > > > > CI fails to build on i386, but that is merely due to missing > > build dependency. > > I don't see and debian/tests dir. Are you sure you pushed? For the sake of clarity, I was mentionning Salsa CI, more specifically, the step consisting in /building/ quorum for i386 architecture, not the /autopkgtest/ run on i386, which is not done using Salsa CI's default pipeline. I don't believe there is any autopkgtest for quorum yet, that might be worth a wishlist item. > In cases where dependencies are missing I added something like > > Architecture: amd64 arm64 mips64el ppc64el riscv64 sh4 > > or something like this to debian/tests/control (this is from > srst2). I did apply similar limitations to mapsembler2 (both in d/control and d/t/control), but that was because the package is unmaintained upstream, and I had to ask FTP Master to remove the package from a selection of architectures a month or two ago. I did not want to risk bringing these packages back by incident, as it occurred once to me already. I think in this case it may better to just keep the package quorum "Architecture: any", in case the dependency ends up being available for i386. The missing build on i386 shouldn't be blocking quorum's transition; I believe there's no regression here. > > Please consider upload or granting upload > > permissions. > > Granted. Feel free to upload since I think I somehow > misunderstood your statement. Thanks for your thoughts and for the permission, the package is uploaded. Have a nice Sunday, :) -- Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/tty1, please excuse my verbosity.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature