Re: Next take in Debian packaging for Mauve
Hi Andreas, apologies for the delayed reply, somehow I missed the
earlier message.
I think the suggestion for naming is fine.
Cheers,
-Aaron
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 09:27 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if I will not hear anything in contrary to my suggestion I assume
> agreement to my suggestion to name the package mauveAligner and
> profressiveMauve CLI tools progressivemauve and the package containig
> the Mauve GUI mauvealigner.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:30:19AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi again Aaron,
> >
> > I'm basically hesitating with uploading since I'm waiting for your final
> > opinion about the package names. Perhaps my last mail was to long and I
> > cutted it down to the naming discussion. The essence might be to name
> > the commandline tool package containing mauveAligner and
> > progressiveMauve simply
> >
> > progressivemauve
> >
> > (since as far as I understood this is the prefered aligner) and than we
> > can name the Mauve package containung the GUI
> >
> > mauvealigner
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:29:06PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > >
> > > > well, this genome alignment software was first released to the world in
> > > > 2003 and development began in 2001, but setting aside the issue of who
> > > > came first I think it would be fine to call the package mauve-aligner or
> > > > something like that. I am less enthusiastic about renaming the `Mauve`
> > > > wrapper script simply to avoid naming conflicts with someone else's
> > > > software because that would involve some substantial revision to the
> > > > documentation and possibly breaking dependent tools.
> > >
> > > Hmmm, I think mauve-aligner would be a bad choice if we leave the
> > > package containing mauveAligner and progressiveMauve with mauvealigner.
> > > The dash as only distinction in the package name sounds a bit weak.
> > > What about
> > >
> > > mauvealigner-gui ?
> > >
> > > As I said its possible to leave the name "mauve" for the wrapper -
> > > possibly also "Mauve" with upper case (please confirm that you prefer
> > > the upper case version).
> > >
> > > > > g-mauve
> > > > > genome-mauve
> > > > > ? (do you have some better suggestion)
> > > >
> > > > i think mauve-aligner would be more natural.
> > >
> > > If you really stick to this would you suggest a different name for the
> > > package carrying the command line applications? May be
> > > "progressivemauve" aus package name might be a better choice?
> > >
> > > > > Thanks a lot for taking the time to read this longish mail. Any hints
> > > > > and recommendations regarding the packaging are highly appreciated.
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > Archive: [🔎] 20150507063019.GD9383@an3as.eu">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20150507063019.GD9383@an3as.eu
> >
> >
>
Reply to: