Aw: Re: Update on Trinityrnaseq packaging
> On Mon Feb 16 2015 at 5:46:42 PM Andreas Tille <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Hi Michael,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 07:09:18AM +0000, Michael Crusoe wrote:
>> I had some quick look into this and did some changed (please pull).
>> Thanks for the changes. I realised that some large files are installed into
>>The name of this dir might support the suspicion that these data are not
>>necessary for using transdecoder but rather for testing. If this is
>>true I'd recommend separating these files into a package
>> (which has architecture all).
>Since this is a Perl program I guess the entirety should be Architecture: all? Since there is less than 10 MB of sample data I prefer to keep it with the main program. Sample >data with example usage helps users understand how the program works, with what file formats, and how to use it.
I propose having the sample data together with a -doc package. The separation
of the executable parts into a package of its own is meant to help the I/O
for the dynamic construction of some runtime environment (chroot, docker,
vm, cloud instance ...) when some workflow specification refers to Trinity
as a dependency.
Many thanks for your tremendous effort on all those packages!