Re: Updating the fis-gtm package to V6.1-000
Hi Amul,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:25:03AM -0400, Amul Shah wrote:
> >I do not see why it should be a goal to avoid postinst/prerm scripts. I
> >personally have not dealt with similar problems but if I would need to I
> >would have a look how openjdk, python or gcc are solving this issue. In
> >any case you can always consult debian-mentors@lists.debian.org if you
> >might face problems to apply the technique used in these packages for
> >fis-gtm.
> [amul:8] Since V6.2-000 was just release, I'm skipping this feature for the V6.1-000 package.
Sounds very reasonable.
> >Multiarch is the way to go.
> [amul:8] I implemented this option. I was surprised by how little work was actually required.
:-)
The tools are quite nifty.
> [amul:8] Could you look over my work when you have some time.
> Everything works as I think it should, which means the work is only
> as good as I think. ;) I think that we are ready to upload V6.1-000.
I uploaded after fixing some lintian overrides. Thanks for your work on
this package.
> [amul:8] I hope to get the V6.2-000 packing done by the end of the
> month. I know this will result in overlapping packages, but I would
> very much like to have the work for V6.1-000 result in a package.
I think it would be great to have V6.2-000 in the next 2-3 weeks.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: