Hi Andreas, On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 08:54:16AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > The Breaks is required for sure (and I hope I would have spotted this in > advance if I would have noticed the package split ... which again proves > how important a proper changelog is - but I guess you got this ;-)). I > think the Replaces is not correct since the data package does not really > replace the main package which exists in parallel. Thus I removed the > Replaces (which usually is a quite common combination on package > renamings also with an additional Provides). I was working based on Debian Policy 7.6.1 but I'll have to do some futher reading into how these relationships work. > I also closed the according bug in the changelog and uploaded the package. Unfortunately I must have fixed the problem before being notified of the bug. I did go looking for it, because I thought there must have been one, but it didn't show up in BTS when I searched. Iain. -- e: irl@fsfe.org w: iain.learmonth.me x: irl@jabber.fsfe.org t: +447875886930 c: MM6MVQ g: IO87we p: 1F72 607C 5FF2 CCD5 3F01 600D 56FF 9EA4 E984 6C49
Attachment:
pgpNEbvIyQsaR.pgp
Description: PGP signature