Re: Plans for ITK version 4
BTW -- just to keep itk4 packaging going forward: tried to build it on
sid, seems to build (32bit tools on 64bit kernel) but some tests
The following tests FAILED:
589 - itkFFTWF_FFTTest (SEGFAULT)
590 - itkFFTWF_RealFFTTest (SEGFAULT)
591 - itkVnlFFTWF_FFTTest (SEGFAULT)
592 - itkVnlFFTWF_RealFFTTest (SEGFAULT)
595 - itkVnlFFTWD_FFTTest (SEGFAULT)
596 - itkVnlFFTWD_RealFFTTest (SEGFAULT)
1300 - itkVectorThresholdSegmentationLevelSetImageFilterTest (Failed)
1327 - itkLevelSetsv4DenseImageBaseTest (Failed)
1647 - itkSimpleImageRegistrationTest (Failed)
1972 - itkOtsuThresholdImageFilterTestShort (Failed)
2142 - DigitallyReconstructedRadiograph1Test (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
make: *** [test] Error 8
make: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/insighttoolkit4-4.0.0/BUILD'
is that something known?
NB that sid environment might be a bit outdated though...
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 01:25:46PM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Steve M. Robbins <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 08:38:44AM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> > >> Steve,
> > >> Thanks for all the work.
> > >> It would be good to have ITK4 in 'experimental'. Having coexisting
> > >> packages is nice to have but will cause probably too much trouble
> > >> (especially if we build all the language wrappers again)
> > > Since it's released, I was planning to upload straight to 'unstable'.
> > > Do you think there's a need to stage in 'experimental' first?
> > I think it is better to have ITK4 in experimental for one or two
> > weeks. This is just to be on the safe side, there are sometimes
> > unexpected problems with including cmake configuration files.
> I fully expect a number of problems with configuration.
> However, I see no problem with working this out in unstable rather
> than experimental. The new packages do not replace any existing
> ones and nothing will build-depend on the new packages at first.
> Can you explain what issue you see with working this out in unstable?
Keep in touch www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic