[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How Debian Packaging practices could apply to VistA maintenance and distribution





On 01/26/2012 05:23 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:10:13AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:

[KSB] Are there packages that are (for example) pure shell scripts
so that there is no difference between a source package and a binary
package?  A VistA Debian package would be like that.
There are packages containing pure HTML pages (some doc packages) and
some packages might contain only some shell script (I do not know
examples but nothing in policy does forbid this.)
Not to forget applications written in scripting languages.
GNUmed packages do not contain any compiled code either
(which, however, got nothing to do with whether you are
looking at the source or the binary package).
[KSB] For packages such as GNUmed, are there separate source and "binary" tarballs?

Regards
-- Bhaskar

Karsten

--
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.

_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.


Reply to: