Hi Andreas Actually now I am a little bit lost about about what are the purposes of the task metapackages and how they should be defined (I am relatively new to Debian development: only few months). I think I'd better read http://blends.alioth.debian.org/blends/ pages before giving propositions. But in the meantime, I can answer to few points raised: On 24/01/2012 17:06, Andreas Tille wrote: > You are right, we do not have a electrophysiology. I think this would > to much reach out into NeuroDebian field (feel free to correct me). As > far as I know NeuroDebian maintains some metapackages in Debian Science > and currently I do not really see any reason to duplicate this work. > It might make sense to let med-psychology suggesting those metapackages > from Debian Science. What do you think? I prefer to read more about blends to avoid replying nonsense. >> Another possibility would be imaging-dev. > > So I *Suggested* it in imaging-dev (because you are speacking about > "possibility"). In fact I suggested "libeeg-dev" just wild guessing > that the final development package will get this name - please correct > me if my guess was wrong. Actually the name of the package will be libeegdev-dev: the first dev part refers to device... But in a certain sense eegdev is slightly misleading since the library can be used for other type of acquisition device (EMG, ECG, NIRS...) >> Another question: I have other packages that could fits in some of the >> tasks. Should I ask to you to include them in the tasks? > > Yes please! Whatever you do which might be of relevance for medical > care in a wider sense, please at least drop us a note. Subscribing this > list would be nice to possibly influence some discussion but I do not > want to ask you for this in case you have hard time constraints and can > not read this list. Yes I've just subscribed to it. >> I think in >> particular about libxdffileio-dev: >> http://packages.debian.org/sid/libxdffileio-dev >> which could fit in Medical data or imaging development. > > Is a "Suggests" correct as well or would you rather consider a > "Recommends"? Argh! I don't know! I would say Suggests. Cheers, Nicolas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature