Re: Bug#656469: ITP: eegdev -- biosignal acquisition device library
Hi Nicolas,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:30:57PM +0100, Nicolas Bourdaud wrote:
> It might be in the psychology task but it is more related to
> electrophysiology but it does not exist debian-med.
You are right, we do not have a electrophysiology. I think this would
to much reach out into NeuroDebian field (feel free to correct me). As
far as I know NeuroDebian maintains some metapackages in Debian Science
and currently I do not really see any reason to duplicate this work.
It might make sense to let med-psychology suggesting those metapackages
from Debian Science. What do you think?
> Another possibility would be imaging-dev.
So I *Suggested* it in imaging-dev (because you are speacking about
"possibility"). In fact I suggested "libeeg-dev" just wild guessing
that the final development package will get this name - please correct
me if my guess was wrong.
> Another question: I have other packages that could fits in some of the
> tasks. Should I ask to you to include them in the tasks?
Yes please! Whatever you do which might be of relevance for medical
care in a wider sense, please at least drop us a note. Subscribing this
list would be nice to possibly influence some discussion but I do not
want to ask you for this in case you have hard time constraints and can
not read this list.
> I think in
> particular about libxdffileio-dev:
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/libxdffileio-dev
> which could fit in Medical data or imaging development.
Is a "Suggests" correct as well or would you rather consider a
"Recommends"?
Any further remark is really welcome
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: