On 01/22/2012 04:06 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
[KSB2] Since there are likely to be multiple changes to make a GT.M Debian package, and since the GT.M distribution tarballs (source and binary) are produced by extensive automation, instead of making changes piecemeal, Luis and I have agreed that he will use the existing tarballs, and keep a a list of the changes he needs to make. I will then verify the changes and work with the actual developers to change our scripting.Hi Bhaskar, On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:14:52PM -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:[KSB] We will work with Luis to make changes in the upstream packaging.The first thing which I would really love to see if the gtm tarballs would install into one single directory named gtm-<version> or something like this.
[KSB] As discussed above, I will follow (a safe distance!) behind Luis! It is better that way, since (a) will be able to validate his work, and (b) I am not as technical as he is (in other words, I have more talent for shooting myself in the foot!).[KSB] I too am grateful to Luis, and I think GT.M was stalled because of its complexity. MoM certainly would have helped me and I'm glad it's helping Luis. Thanks, Andreas.Sometimes it needs some time until the right ideas come up. BTW, there is no reason for you not to try the same approach as Luis and at least come to a point where you can build and test the packages.
Regards -- Bhaskar
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises. _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.