On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:24:13 +0100 Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote: > IMHO it is close to OK. The thing is that you are using the very same > name for the changed tarball as your original upstream tarball. I have > no idea whether you would like to follow Charles' and append "~dfsg" to > the version string or whatever (sorry, forgot to mention this after my > changes). Hi Andreas, I have just committed this change and now the version is 0.2.1~dfsg. Kind regards, -- Leonardo Robol <leo@robol.it>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature