On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Charles Plessy
<plessy@debian.org> wrote:
Dear all,
we have hundred of packages, and making sure that they are all comprehensively
tagged takes time.
As discussed earlier, the Debtags are not a hierarchical structure, that is,
field::biology:bioinformatics is not a child of field::biology.
http://lists.debian.org/20090111054840.GG3279@kunpuu.plessy.org
In that sense, specialised tags are unnecessary complications unless they have
a direct use. In our case, we have metapackages to guide our users to
bioinformatics packages.
Since we have a works-with::biological-sequence, I think I will start to go
ahead and replace field::biology:bioinformatics by works-with::biological-sequence.
Similarly, I am not using anymore the biology:: facet, that was created as a
compromise at a moment where I did not understand Debtags well, and propose to
delete them unless somebody uses them.
Is everybody fine with this ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: [🔎] 20120105021726.GA1991@merveille.plessy.net" target="_blank">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20120105021726.GA1991@merveille.plessy.net