On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:18:04AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > > >> I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confident > >> with the ftgl patch. For some reason FTLibrary.h is not installed in > >> ftgl installation but seems to be used by VTK internals. > > > > What are the differences between the VTK version of these > > libraries and their respective upstream version? > > VTK ships a convenient FTGL 1.32 version (April 23 2002), I guess the question really is twofold: 1. Are there any patches to 1.32 in the VTK tree? > while debian > archive contains 2.1.3 since 2008-05-03 > The API changed a bit. 2. Is upgrading the lib going to break any hidden assumptions made by VTK? Certainly it's good to remove duplicate library copies, but we should be careful not to introduce regressions. If this effort is successful, please send it upstream; c.f. http://www.vtk.org/Bug/view.php?id=3824 Cheers, -Steve
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature