Re: "Could not perform immediate configuration" with debian-med
Hi andreas,
backporting may be a huge tasks. I raised the point in a previous mail, but GBrowse depends on many perl modules and bioperl.
Gbrowse by itself would be ok (I think), but bioperl stuff would be a pain I think....
Olivier
----- Mail original -----
> De: "Andreas Tille" <andreas@an3as.eu>
> À: "Scott Cain" <scott@scottcain.net>
> Cc: debian-med@lists.debian.org
> Envoyé: Vendredi 5 Août 2011 23:26:59
> Objet: Re: "Could not perform immediate configuration" with debian-med
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:34:45PM -0400, Scott Cain wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestions, though I'm feeling neither tentative nor
> > venturous at the moment :-) I was unsurprised by the long list of
> > packages to be installed, since GBrowse does have a fairly long
> > dependency list. I'll wait for the gbrowse package to make it to
> > ubuntu, or for my IT folks to update the server in question to
> > debian
> > 6.
>
> Using debian 6.x is definitely a good idea - chances are good that the
> gbrowse package will work there. If it is really important for you we
> might consider providing a backport. Just let us know if you need
> further help.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: 20110805212659.GE26587@an3as.eu">http://lists.debian.org/20110805212659.GE26587@an3as.eu
Reply to: