Re: ODIN! (was: ODIN, anyone?)
- To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: ODIN! (was: ODIN, anyone?)
- From: Michael Hanke <michael.hanke@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:36:11 +0100
- Message-id: <20090325163611.GA4193@localhost>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-med@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903251436590.5408@wr-linux02>
- References: <20090323144428.GA11842@balin.lan> <20090323192056.1a749338@pingu> <20090323211156.GA21129@runkel> <20090325090821.GB1715@localhost> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903251205480.5408@wr-linux02> <20090325112702.GA5536@localhost> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903251349570.5408@wr-linux02> <20090325131847.GA8839@localhost> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903251436590.5408@wr-linux02>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:42:48PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> BTW, I noticed that we just had an odin entry in imaging-dev. I have
> no idea wher it does fit better - just decide yourself and remove one
> entry where it is not properly placed.
Ah! I knew it was there -- somewhere. Anyway, I'd say ODIN is actually
both application and developer tool (it even builds a -dev package
alongside the main app). How do we handle that. When the package is in
Debian I will list the -dev in imaging-dev and ODIN in imaging itself,
but for now?
It is probably enough to have it in either one -- OTOH it also doesn't
hurt to have it in both of them.
Michael
--
GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke
http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke
ICQ: 48230050
Reply to: