Re: Giving away CTN
Hi,
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:56:51AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008, Michael Hanke wrote:
>
>> I haven't looked at the package yet, but maybe it would make sense for
>> me to strip it down to the actually useful parts. If the overall popcon
>> count is low, it might really be just a dev lib.
>
> So the action to do seems to be quite simple: Michael, could you take
> over the work to strip down the ctn package to the things you need, put
> this under group maintenance and upload.
Not sure if that is the proper order of events ;-)
I'd like to hear the oppinion of the ctsim maintainer first (CC'ed), whether a
stripped down version of ctn is sufficient for his needs (and what can
actually be stripped down).
Kevin: What do you think about CTN as a dependency of ctsim. Are there
plan to move the something else instead. What is the actual
functionality of CTN that is used by ctsim?
Michael
--
GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke
http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke
ICQ: 48230050
Reply to: