Bug#951678: adequate reports obsolete-conffile while it is upgraded
Package: mate-applets
Version: 1.24.0-1
Severity: normal
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags : obsolete-conffile@adequate
I got the following obsolete-conffile warning while upgrading mate-applets -
~$ adequate mate-applets
mate-applets: obsolete-conffile
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.mate.CPUFreqSelector.conf
Please fix it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental'), (100, 'unstable'), (50,
'experimental-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages mate-applets depends on:
ii gsettings-desktop-schemas 3.34.0-2
ii gvfs 1.42.2-1
ii libatk1.0-0 2.34.1-1
ii libc6 2.29-10
ii libcairo2 1.16.0-4
ii libcpupower2 5.4.19-1
ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.110-5
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.40.0+dfsg-2
ii libglib2.0-0 2.62.4-2
ii libgtk-3-0 3.24.13-1
ii libgtksourceview-3.0-1 3.24.11-2
ii libgtop-2.0-11 2.40.0-2
ii libgucharmap-2-90-7 1:12.0.1-2
ii libiw30 30~pre9-13+b1
ii libmate-panel-applet-4-1 1.24.0-1
ii libmateweather1 1.24.0-1
ii libnotify4 0.7.8-1
ii libpango-1.0-0 1.42.4-7
ii libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.42.4-7
ii libpolkit-gobject-1-0 0.105-26
ii libupower-glib3 0.99.11-1
ii libwnck-3-0 3.32.0-1
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.8-1
ii libxml2 2.9.4+dfsg1-8
ii mate-applets-common 1.24.0-1
ii mate-panel 1.24.0-1
Versions of packages mate-applets recommends:
ii mate-media 1.24.0-1
ii mate-polkit 1.24.0-1
ii mate-system-monitor 1.24.0-1
mate-applets suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C
Reply to: