Hello Hiroshi, On 02/04/2026 12:51, yokota wrote:
Package: 7zip ... -Breaks: p7zip-full (<= 16.02+dfsg-8), - p7zip (<= 16.02+dfsg-8) -Replaces: p7zip-full (<= 16.02+dfsg-8), - p7zip (<= 16.02+dfsg-8) +Breaks: p7zip-full (<< 16.02+transitional.1), + p7zip (<< 16.02+transitional.1) +Replaces: p7zip-full (<< 16.02+transitional.1), + p7zip (<< 16.02+transitional.1)p7zip has no transitional package at that time. We already have transitional package, so your fix is reasonable.
Great!
* 7zip: I uploaded 7zip-25/bookworm to pu, but this gets in the way of the 7zip -> 7zip+7zip-standalone split (cf. #1050118, /usr/bin/7zz conflict): Package: 7zip-standalone Replaces: 7zip (<< 23.01+dfsg-4~)...Or, always update 7zip-standalone/trixie with a Break on prior versions: -Replaces: 7zip (<< 23.01+dfsg-4~) +Replaces: 7zip (<< 25.01+dfsg-1~)I like simple one to ease maintain the packages. I adds fix to debian/trixie branch. Is it suitable for you? https://salsa.debian.org/debian/7zip/-/commit/f6b1d6aa8721a3ccd34c69f458fd146e49e2ef5c https://salsa.debian.org/debian/7zip/-/commits/debian/trixie
This works for my local tests :)The downside is: we'll need to update this 7zip-standalone "Replaces:" version for all future security versions (e.g. a future 26.01 fixing CVEs).
Depending on the OSRM answer, I'll also try to revert to a 22.01+really25.01+dfsg-0+deb12u1 version scheme to avoid this second issue entirely, and make clear that the bookworm packaging didn't apply either transitions.
Cheers! Sylvain Beucler Debian LTS Team