Re: Issues fixed in buster and bookworm but not in bullseye
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 09:14:22AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>
> So, most of the remaining 23 packages, especially as it's only 1-2 CVEs for
> each package, and especially when they are not sponsored, are very
> low-priority.
>
(Apologies for the late reply.)
I concur. Let's not get carried away adding loads of packages to the
queue. If there are legitimately high priority CVEs (which for this
group of packages there aren't), then that's another thing.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Reply to: