Re: Bug#1042057: binNMUs needed for new pandoc in *stable

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Sun, 2023-10-01 at 22:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-10-01 at 18:37 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > wb nmu 10 gitit haskell-hakyll . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild to
> > clear version space for rebuilds in stable; see #1042058"
> > wb nmu 6 gitit haskell-hakyll . ANY . bookworm . -m "Rebuild
> > against
> > new pandoc; see #1042058"
> > wb nmu 2 gitit haskell-hakyll . ANY . bullseye . -m "Rebuild
> > against
> > new pandoc; see #1042057"
> 
> The packages don't build in unstable currently, so I've binNMUed them
> in testing and we'll see if we can get them prop-upped.
> 

That worked.

> For bullseye, haskell-hakyll ends up needing a version of haskell-
> pandoc-citeproc built against the newer pandoc, so I've binNMUed that
> as well.
> 

Those are all done now.

The gitit rebuild in bullseye FTBFS on mipsel, which is apparently
#1023021. Given gitit's popcon, and the likelihood of it having an
active user base on mipsel, I'm not considering that as a blocker.

Regards,

Adam