Re: EOL candidates for security-support-ended.deb10 (recap)

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>]

On 10/08/2022 17:10, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/08/2022 11:47, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 09/08/2022 19:04, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > > Here's a little recap for security-support-ended.deb9 -> deb10 evaluation, 
> > > following our discussion, also including dropped entries for 
> > > completeness/transparency:
> > >
> > >
> > > Supported again in buster:
> > > - ansible
> > > - chromium
> >
> > chromium was already EOL'd in buster by the Security Team:
> >
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2022/msg00012.html
> >
> > We should keep it unsupported, I'd say.
>
> Thanks, it wasn't marked unsupported in security-support-ended.deb10, so I 
> assumed support was still ongoing (I should have perused the latest DSAs).
>
> It now is referenced:
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debian-security-support/-/commit/4ae91af1a7f8bd317e6e24ffcf6ed22fbc6cccb8 

I see those changes were applied in the master branch. Should they be backported 
to the buster branch, with an eventual upload / DLA?

Cheers,
Emilio