Re: RFC: Peculiar dependency change in graphicsmagick

[Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>]

Hi Markus,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:22:51PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi Guido,
> 
> Am 10.11.2017 um 21:34 schrieb Guido Günther:
> > Hi apo,
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:17:33PM +0000, Chris Lamb wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Well spotted!
> >>
> >>> Please disregard.  I have discussed this with apo in IRC.  Everything is
> >>> in order with the packages I built and I will be uploading them shortly.
> >>
> >> As I was curious, I checked IRC — for posterity and to save the rest
> >> of this list also looking it up:
> > 
> > Thanks Chris for diggint this out.
> > 
> >>
> >>  <apo> regarding graphicsmagick: I usually build every package with
> >>        cowbuilder in a clean chroot environment but there was an issue with
> >>        git-buildpackage hence I built the package in my wheezy schroot
> > 
> > Pleae let me know about git-buildpackage issues. If it's unclear that's
> > a bug use git-buildpackage@lists.debian.org or mail me directly.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> >  -- Guido
> 
> It's more like a handling error. When I use gbp like that:
> 
> ARCH=amd64 git-buildpackage --git-dist=wheezy
> 
> the build will fail in debian/rules line 31 because the
> hardening-includes package does not exist in Sid anymore. What I am
> trying to do is to build graphicsmagick in a clean cowbuilder
> environment and in wheezy hardening-includes is of course still
> existent, so I wouldn't expect this error in the first place. There must
> be a way to tell gbp to ignore line 31 but I haven't figured out how do
> it yet.

Assuming you're using pbuilder does

  git-buildpackage --git-dist=wheezy --git-arch=amd64 -nc

work?
Cheers,
 -- Guido