On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:17:46AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2017-06-25 16:56:46, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have prepared an update for apache2 and I would like to request some > > testing. The packages are here: > > > > https://people.debian.org/~roberto/apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u9.dsc > > https://people.debian.org/~roberto/apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u9_amd64.changes > > https://people.debian.org/~roberto/apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u8_2.2.22-13+deb7u9.diff > > > > I have also attached the debdiff to this email. I was able to cherry > > pick the commits from the 2.2.x branch in upsteam's subversion > > repository. However, I did have to make some tweaks since upstream is > > up to version 2.2.33 and wheezy is at 2.2.22, hence why I am asking for > > some additional testing. > > > > Unless I receive reports of problems with the packages I have prepared, > > I intend to upload them in one week. > > I did some summary smoke-testing (install apache2 on a wheezy VM, > upgrade, load the "it works page") and things seem to generally work. > > I have also reviewed the patches and after I wiped the blood from my > eyes, things looked marvelous there as well. ;) (I am always amazed as > to the scale of changes introduced in Apache minor versions...) > Thanks for the report. I found these changes be very small and easy to digest. But then, the last updates I have done (starting with most recent) were imagemagick, icu, ghostscript, samba, imagemagick, php5, imagemagick, ghostscript, and icu. By comparison, apache2 was a piece of cake :-) Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature