Re: CVE-2015-9059 (Accepted picocom 1.7-1+deb7u1 (source amd64) into oldstable)

To: "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>
Cc: Matt Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>, debian-lts@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: CVE-2015-9059 (Accepted picocom 1.7-1+deb7u1 (source amd64) into oldstable)
From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 09:36:32 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1496392592.2757041.996360856.538E8810@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20170602083144.ntv3bvjku3n7dldw@fama>
References: <E1dGXVq-0002ls-FH@seger.debian.org> <20170602080724.kavoqpquwddrjny4@fama> <[🔎] 1496391710.2753311.996347584.47455740@webmail.messagingengine.com> <[🔎] 20170602083144.ntv3bvjku3n7dldw@fama>

W. Martin Borgert wrote:

> Just to be sure, we talk about the same patch...
> I meant the one I added Tue, 30 May 2017 to the bug report:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=863671;filename=fix-command-injection-vulnerability;msg=14

No :)


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CVE-2015-9059 (Accepted picocom 1.7-1+deb7u1 (source amd64) into oldstable)
  - From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

References:
- Re: CVE-2015-9059 (Accepted picocom 1.7-1+deb7u1 (source amd64) into oldstable)
  - From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
- Re: CVE-2015-9059 (Accepted picocom 1.7-1+deb7u1 (source amd64) into oldstable)
  - From: "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: CVE-2015-9059 (Accepted picocom 1.7-1+deb7u1 (source amd64) into oldstable)
Next by Date: Re: CVE-2015-9059 (Accepted picocom 1.7-1+deb7u1 (source amd64) into oldstable)
Previous by thread: Re: CVE-2015-9059 (Accepted picocom 1.7-1+deb7u1 (source amd64) into oldstable)
Next by thread: Re: CVE-2015-9059 (Accepted picocom 1.7-1+deb7u1 (source amd64) into oldstable)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread