Re: Wheezy update of r-base?
On 17 March 2017 at 18:01, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
| Yes please do so. Will you send the DLA or do you want me to do so?
Will do. Is it wheezy-security or (per the discussion at
Please do the DLA if you could, and/or coordinate with Moritz who is doing it
| / Ola
| Sent from a phone
| Den 17 mar 2017 17:40 skrev "Dirk Eddelbuettel" <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
| On 15 March 2017 at 12:35, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
| | Hi
| | I just realize that the wheezy version I mentioned was based on stable
| | Simply add +deb7u1 to the wheezy version number.
| I have those built as 2.15.1-4+deb7u1 -- shall I upload them to
| | / Ola
| | Sent from a phone
| | Den 15 mar 2017 08:37 skrev "Salvatore Bonaccorso" <email@example.com>:
| | Hi,
| | On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:12:56PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
| | > Hi Dirk
| | >
| | > I had a quick look at this but I stumbled on the version of the
| | > Why 3.1.1-1+deb3.3.3u1 ?
| | > And not 3.1.1u1 or even better 3.1.1+deb8u1 ?
| | For the versioning: jessie currently has 3.1.1-1. By only applying
| | patches addressing the CVE, then the version should be
| | Cf. https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/
| | bug-security-building
| | HTH, Regards,
| | Salvatore
| http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | firstname.lastname@example.org
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | email@example.com