[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Security update of firefox-esr for Wheezy



On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:52:29PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 04/08/16 23:02, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 07:50:28PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:32:14PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 11:04:47AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >>>> Hello Mike,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you for preparing the security update of firefox-esr. I have just
> >>>> sent a security announcement for your update in Wheezy to the
> >>>> debian-lts-announce mailing list. If you want to take care of this next
> >>>> time, please follow our guidelines which we have outlined at [1]. If
> >>>> this is a burden for you, no problem, we will do our best and take care
> >>>> of the rest. In this case we would like to ask you to send a short
> >>>> reminder to debian-lts, so that we can prepare the announcement in a
> >>>> timely manner.
> >>>
> >>> Heh, I hadn't realized that wasn't handled by standard DSAs, sorry about
> >>> that. That these updates go through the same security-master doesn't
> >>> help making it obvious they are different.
> >>>
> >>> Anyways, I'd rather not have more work to do, so if can send
> >>> announcements, that works for me. Or you can deal with the backport
> >>> from back to back.
> >>>
> >>> Please note that the next ESR bump (52) will require GCC 4.8, which is
> >>> not in wheezy, so I won't be building ESR45 for wheezy past 45.8,
> >>> presumably some time in April next year.
> >>
> >> The same is true for icedove. Since this is way before the end of Wheezy
> >> LTS (31st May 2018) I wonder if we should EOL Firefox/Icedove then or
> >> try to support this for longer?
> >>
> >> I have no idea what features of gcc-4.8 would be required, Mike do you
> >> know?
> > 
> > Some C++11 features it supports that GCC 4.7 doesn't.
> 
> We may want / need to backport GCC 4.8 to Wheezy then. Chromium is already
> unsupported, so it's either that, or leave Wheezy with no supported browsers. We
> probably want the former.

I too think I would be good to support Firefox & Icedove until Wheezy
goes EOL. Wd could backport gcc 4.8 from Jessie with only C/C++ enabled.

Cheers,
 -- Guido


Reply to: