Hi again, On Di 29 Sep 2015 15:06:23 CEST, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Raphael, On Di 29 Sep 2015 13:55:06 CEST, Raphael Hertzog wrote:On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote:Is there a reason that no "squeeze update of ..." mail has been sent for libemail-address-perl, yet, (i.e., when triaging the latest security issue in that package)?Yes, the fix is so easy that sending the above mail would take more time than fixing the package and the package is part of the Perl team which is rather happy when we do the work and push our update in their git repository (I believe all DD have write access to their git repositories).ok. Thanks for the answer. Will continue with fixing libemail-address-perl, then.Best, Mike
another question about this simple fix-up (SORRY)...As it seems the issue is only referenced via a TEMP-* ID  in the Debian Security Tracker. Furthermore, no bug is referenced there , either. And... the issue is already fixed in testing/unstable.
Shall I file a new bug with exact affected versions (as found in jessie, wheezy, squeeze-lts) and attach it to the TEMP-* security tracker ID and then reference that new bug in my squeeze-lts upload?
Thanks for input, Mike  https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/TEMP-0000000-F41FA7 -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: email@example.com, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur